<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Russ Leavitt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.russleavitt.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.russleavitt.com</link>
	<description>Fire Protection Industry Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:23:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Be careful what you ask for. . . by Edward Kosakowski</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/comment-page-1/#comment-10411</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Kosakowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=30#comment-10411</guid>
		<description>Russ,
 I am looking for some help. Not sure if you will be able to provide it, but here goes. I am looking to find a course to be trained for nfpa 25. I live in New Jersey. Have been searching the internet and coming up empty. Any ideas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,<br />
 I am looking for some help. Not sure if you will be able to provide it, but here goes. I am looking to find a course to be trained for nfpa 25. I live in New Jersey. Have been searching the internet and coming up empty. Any ideas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be careful what you ask for. . . by Jesus M Carrasquillo</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/comment-page-1/#comment-5227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus M Carrasquillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=30#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>Dear Russ, 
I have to tell you that NICET is the greatest certification (in relation to the industry) on earth. Unfortunately it has being underrated by Fire Contractors business owners. Let’s take for example in New Jersey. NJ adopted on 2003 NICET requirements in order to obtain a business license. On the other hand some individuals where grandfather-in because of their track record and experience.
 In my opinion it was the BIGGEST MISTAKE made by the state against the industry. These business owners feel that since they hold a valid license, their technicians do not need their own and that is causing a conflict when inspecting. 
For example:
A certified inspector notes some deficiencies on the report while a competitor&#039;s non certified technician says the opposite. 
To me it is disgusting within the industry the fact that we criticize each other just to make a buck and keep a customer happy. It is not a well earned dollar. To me is a false claim and should be punishable but since AHJ&#039;S don’t know any better contractors continue to get away with it. AHJ&#039;S should be required to obtain NICET certification as well if they want to keep a job. When I lived in Florida I attended Broward County C.C. and obtained a Fire Marshall License how ever I learned more thru NICET than anything else.
To all service technicians out there reading, please do not let anyone choose you path. Take action and educate now. Become an asset and a marketable individual nationally not locally.
God Bless Everyone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Russ,<br />
I have to tell you that NICET is the greatest certification (in relation to the industry) on earth. Unfortunately it has being underrated by Fire Contractors business owners. Let’s take for example in New Jersey. NJ adopted on 2003 NICET requirements in order to obtain a business license. On the other hand some individuals where grandfather-in because of their track record and experience.<br />
 In my opinion it was the BIGGEST MISTAKE made by the state against the industry. These business owners feel that since they hold a valid license, their technicians do not need their own and that is causing a conflict when inspecting.<br />
For example:<br />
A certified inspector notes some deficiencies on the report while a competitor&#8217;s non certified technician says the opposite.<br />
To me it is disgusting within the industry the fact that we criticize each other just to make a buck and keep a customer happy. It is not a well earned dollar. To me is a false claim and should be punishable but since AHJ&#8217;S don’t know any better contractors continue to get away with it. AHJ&#8217;S should be required to obtain NICET certification as well if they want to keep a job. When I lived in Florida I attended Broward County C.C. and obtained a Fire Marshall License how ever I learned more thru NICET than anything else.<br />
To all service technicians out there reading, please do not let anyone choose you path. Take action and educate now. Become an asset and a marketable individual nationally not locally.<br />
God Bless Everyone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be careful what you ask for. . . by Arthur Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/comment-page-1/#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=30#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>Russ,

At three to six months I was hardly competent but given in 1976 90% of the systems installed were pipe schedule, coupled with the fact all we had were 1/2&quot; upright and pendent sprinklers, I was actually laying out sprinklers and sizing the pipe pretty much on my own.

Forgot, we had 17/32&quot; sprinklers to but that was left to the guys who could do hydraulic calculations the Jack Wood way.  Hundreds of old time designers attended one of Jack Woods three day hydraulic calculation seminars at Viking in Hastings, MI.

In the first year I had lots of excellent supervision and I was fortunate to be taught by one of what I would consider to be the best in the industry. Two, three and four times a day he would drop in to see how I was doing and take the time to tell me what I was doing wrong and allow me to correct my errors.  He wouldn&#039;t tolerate anything less than perfection, this sometimes drove me nuts but served me well over the years, but he gave me enough room to learn without getting frustrated.

At the end three to six months I could lay out a simple system of a few hundred heads, I would get most of it right but it was always checked before it went out the door.

Point I was making was I doubt a totally green trainee could lay out a system with calculations given after just a few months given all we have to work with today.

My first NFPA #13 was about 130 pages and maybe 8&quot;x5&quot; big. If you wore jeans you could fit it in your hip pocket.

If it&#039;s changed this much in the last 30 years what will the next 30 bring?

No doubt there are a number of inspectors around the country that do an excellent job while not being NICET certified but NICET certification appears to be the way many states are heading.  Not that it will make them better in itself but anyone doing inspecting should be working towards that NICET.  It&#039;s a big deal now and going to get bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p>At three to six months I was hardly competent but given in 1976 90% of the systems installed were pipe schedule, coupled with the fact all we had were 1/2&#8243; upright and pendent sprinklers, I was actually laying out sprinklers and sizing the pipe pretty much on my own.</p>
<p>Forgot, we had 17/32&#8243; sprinklers to but that was left to the guys who could do hydraulic calculations the Jack Wood way.  Hundreds of old time designers attended one of Jack Woods three day hydraulic calculation seminars at Viking in Hastings, MI.</p>
<p>In the first year I had lots of excellent supervision and I was fortunate to be taught by one of what I would consider to be the best in the industry. Two, three and four times a day he would drop in to see how I was doing and take the time to tell me what I was doing wrong and allow me to correct my errors.  He wouldn&#8217;t tolerate anything less than perfection, this sometimes drove me nuts but served me well over the years, but he gave me enough room to learn without getting frustrated.</p>
<p>At the end three to six months I could lay out a simple system of a few hundred heads, I would get most of it right but it was always checked before it went out the door.</p>
<p>Point I was making was I doubt a totally green trainee could lay out a system with calculations given after just a few months given all we have to work with today.</p>
<p>My first NFPA #13 was about 130 pages and maybe 8&#8243;x5&#8243; big. If you wore jeans you could fit it in your hip pocket.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s changed this much in the last 30 years what will the next 30 bring?</p>
<p>No doubt there are a number of inspectors around the country that do an excellent job while not being NICET certified but NICET certification appears to be the way many states are heading.  Not that it will make them better in itself but anyone doing inspecting should be working towards that NICET.  It&#8217;s a big deal now and going to get bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be careful what you ask for. . . by Russ Leavitt</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/comment-page-1/#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Leavitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=30#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>Hi Art,
thank you for your comments.  However, I am a bit confused by a couple of things.

1. I am not sure where you find in the article that I am calling for Level II inspectors be allowed to inspect. I do not propose that any particular NICET level (II or III) for inspections of systems. You wrote about the chemical plant that you inspect. I would take it a step further and state that the most important issue is an individual&#039;s actual ability to do the work needed. Certification (regardless of the level) is just the starting point.  A wise service provider is going to make sure that the inspector is qualified for the particular project and the scope that has been contracted.  If you read the article again, I am simply pointing out the consequences of a state or jurisdiction requiring NICET certification. I am not calling for a lowering of standards--quite the opposite.
2. Your last paragraph baffles me. I do not belittle the job of layout techincian. I do not know where that comment comes from.  I started in the industry as a layout technician and have held a level IV certifciation since 1990.  if you felt qualified after 6 months, you were a lot faster than me. 
The thrust of the article is to spur discussion and thought regarding NICET certification since it is the most recognized organization for setting layout and inspection techician standards in our industry but NICET certification may not always be the best (or only) solution for qualifying individuals. That does not mean that I do not think it is a excellent vehicle.
I agree with most everything you write and if you look again at my article, you will see that.  

Again, thanks for your comments.
Russ   

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-3569&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Arthur Gould &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Art,<br />
thank you for your comments.  However, I am a bit confused by a couple of things.</p>
<p>1. I am not sure where you find in the article that I am calling for Level II inspectors be allowed to inspect. I do not propose that any particular NICET level (II or III) for inspections of systems. You wrote about the chemical plant that you inspect. I would take it a step further and state that the most important issue is an individual&#8217;s actual ability to do the work needed. Certification (regardless of the level) is just the starting point.  A wise service provider is going to make sure that the inspector is qualified for the particular project and the scope that has been contracted.  If you read the article again, I am simply pointing out the consequences of a state or jurisdiction requiring NICET certification. I am not calling for a lowering of standards&#8211;quite the opposite.<br />
2. Your last paragraph baffles me. I do not belittle the job of layout techincian. I do not know where that comment comes from.  I started in the industry as a layout technician and have held a level IV certifciation since 1990.  if you felt qualified after 6 months, you were a lot faster than me.<br />
The thrust of the article is to spur discussion and thought regarding NICET certification since it is the most recognized organization for setting layout and inspection techician standards in our industry but NICET certification may not always be the best (or only) solution for qualifying individuals. That does not mean that I do not think it is a excellent vehicle.<br />
I agree with most everything you write and if you look again at my article, you will see that.  </p>
<p>Again, thanks for your comments.<br />
Russ   </p>
<p><a href="#comment-3569" rel="nofollow">@Arthur Gould </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be careful what you ask for. . . by Arthur Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/comment-page-1/#comment-3571</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=30#comment-3571</guid>
		<description>On to another note the real big crunch is going to be in layout technicians when the economy gets moving again.

We&#039;re not training anyone and what&#039;s even more perplexing is you can&#039;t find anyone that is interested enough to even give it a look as a career.  

And when you do hire how do you train, where do you start?  How many months will a trainee work before the company realizes the first dollar out of their efforts?  Six months? A year?

Even in this recession if you were to bus 12 NICET III certified inspector&#039;s into Atlanta and give each one a car for the week I just have to think all 12 would have jobs with good pay and benefits by the end of the week.  With the way laws are being written the job is nearly recession proof and nobody is interested.

Why?  

I bring this up because I&#039;m NICET certified in layout and in the states I am licensed in laws and regulations permit NICET III or IV to perform inspections so even if construction jobs go to zero I&#039;ll still have a job.  Where else, what other industry is there, where you can you say something like this?

For the record I&#039;ve been a layout technician since the mid 70&#039;s and I had to read and study NFPA real close for six months before I felt qualified.  Don&#039;t belittle the job, there&#039;s a lot more professionalism to it than most would think until you&#039;ve done it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On to another note the real big crunch is going to be in layout technicians when the economy gets moving again.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not training anyone and what&#8217;s even more perplexing is you can&#8217;t find anyone that is interested enough to even give it a look as a career.  </p>
<p>And when you do hire how do you train, where do you start?  How many months will a trainee work before the company realizes the first dollar out of their efforts?  Six months? A year?</p>
<p>Even in this recession if you were to bus 12 NICET III certified inspector&#8217;s into Atlanta and give each one a car for the week I just have to think all 12 would have jobs with good pay and benefits by the end of the week.  With the way laws are being written the job is nearly recession proof and nobody is interested.</p>
<p>Why?  </p>
<p>I bring this up because I&#8217;m NICET certified in layout and in the states I am licensed in laws and regulations permit NICET III or IV to perform inspections so even if construction jobs go to zero I&#8217;ll still have a job.  Where else, what other industry is there, where you can you say something like this?</p>
<p>For the record I&#8217;ve been a layout technician since the mid 70&#8217;s and I had to read and study NFPA real close for six months before I felt qualified.  Don&#8217;t belittle the job, there&#8217;s a lot more professionalism to it than most would think until you&#8217;ve done it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be careful what you ask for. . . by Arthur Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/comment-page-1/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=30#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>Russ, I disagree with your assertion NICET II certificate holders be allowed to inspect.

As of of April 3, 2009 the NICET registry contained the following numbers for water based inspectors.

NICET Level I 1,164
NICET Level I 1,244
NICET Level I 482
Total 2,890

Does allowing NICET II holders to inspect increase the number of inspectors for a state?  

It doesn&#039;t appear have as much of an impact as we might think.

Georgia is one of those states that require Level III to inspect and consequently 83 of the countries 482 (17.2%) Level III&#039;s on the registry live in Georgia.  In addition to the Level III&#039;s Georgia has 44 Level I&#039;s and 37 Level II&#039;s.

Florida requires NICET II to inspect and the impact on Florida&#039;s registry numbers is 196 Level I&#039;s, 178 Level II&#039;s but only 38 Level III&#039;s.

Adjusting for the total population for Florida&#039;s 18,328,340 Florida has 1 qualified inspector (NICET II or III) per 84,853 population.

With Georgia&#039;s 9,685,744 population there&#039;s one qualified inspector (NICET III only) out of 116,695 population.

Of course this doesn&#039;t tell the entire story for while I have nothing published to base it on I think Florida has more sprinkler systems per million inhabitants than Georgia does.

I do not agree with Florida&#039;s decision to grant inspectors authorizations to NICET II certificate holders because I am thinking of a fitter type with two years total experience and find it hard to believe he can conduct a diesel engine driven fire pump test.  In two years he might have done four or five diesel engine pump tests and on the sixth one he is qualified to be running it?

How about an interim type license?  Let&#039;s say NICET II&#039;s can inspect wet systems only or maybe even wet or dry systems only in non storage type facilities freeing up the NICET III&#039;s for the more complex inspections as they gain more experience?

Near me we inspect a chemical plant that has 44 systems of all types along with a couple large pumps.  I can&#039;t believe there&#039;s a single NICET II certificate holder with two years experience that is qualified to inspect that complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, I disagree with your assertion NICET II certificate holders be allowed to inspect.</p>
<p>As of of April 3, 2009 the NICET registry contained the following numbers for water based inspectors.</p>
<p>NICET Level I 1,164<br />
NICET Level I 1,244<br />
NICET Level I 482<br />
Total 2,890</p>
<p>Does allowing NICET II holders to inspect increase the number of inspectors for a state?  </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t appear have as much of an impact as we might think.</p>
<p>Georgia is one of those states that require Level III to inspect and consequently 83 of the countries 482 (17.2%) Level III&#8217;s on the registry live in Georgia.  In addition to the Level III&#8217;s Georgia has 44 Level I&#8217;s and 37 Level II&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Florida requires NICET II to inspect and the impact on Florida&#8217;s registry numbers is 196 Level I&#8217;s, 178 Level II&#8217;s but only 38 Level III&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Adjusting for the total population for Florida&#8217;s 18,328,340 Florida has 1 qualified inspector (NICET II or III) per 84,853 population.</p>
<p>With Georgia&#8217;s 9,685,744 population there&#8217;s one qualified inspector (NICET III only) out of 116,695 population.</p>
<p>Of course this doesn&#8217;t tell the entire story for while I have nothing published to base it on I think Florida has more sprinkler systems per million inhabitants than Georgia does.</p>
<p>I do not agree with Florida&#8217;s decision to grant inspectors authorizations to NICET II certificate holders because I am thinking of a fitter type with two years total experience and find it hard to believe he can conduct a diesel engine driven fire pump test.  In two years he might have done four or five diesel engine pump tests and on the sixth one he is qualified to be running it?</p>
<p>How about an interim type license?  Let&#8217;s say NICET II&#8217;s can inspect wet systems only or maybe even wet or dry systems only in non storage type facilities freeing up the NICET III&#8217;s for the more complex inspections as they gain more experience?</p>
<p>Near me we inspect a chemical plant that has 44 systems of all types along with a couple large pumps.  I can&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s a single NICET II certificate holder with two years experience that is qualified to inspect that complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome from Russ Leavitt by Jodie R</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/welcome-from-russ-leavitt/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=5#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Russ,

Thank you for responding.  I appreciate the honest answers.  I also appreciate the offer to discuss this further and I will probably take you up on the offer after I do a little more research on this subject. (Other questions may come up.)

Thanks again!
-Jodie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,</p>
<p>Thank you for responding.  I appreciate the honest answers.  I also appreciate the offer to discuss this further and I will probably take you up on the offer after I do a little more research on this subject. (Other questions may come up.)</p>
<p>Thanks again!<br />
-Jodie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome from Russ Leavitt by Russ Leavitt</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/welcome-from-russ-leavitt/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Leavitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=5#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Jodie,
1. The vast majority of hydrualic calculations for fire sprinkler systems are performed on a computer. There may be a small demand for a calculator to be used in doing field surveys, waterflow analysis, and such but I emphasize that it would most likely be very small.  However, one possible exception would be the future single family residential sprinkler market.  The hydraulic calculations are much simpler than those requried for multi-unit residential or commerical applications.  Plumbing contractors would be the target but we are probably several years away from a vialble market.
2. I do not have a definite workforce size but it is estimated that there are approximately 7500 active fire protectoin contractors in the United States. the majorty are small cottage businesses.  I would estimate total workforce of 60,000 to 70,000 with about 80% being field (installers/fitters).
3. there is very little need to use hydraulic calculations beyond basic principles.

Not sure if this is much help.  I would be happy to discuss further if you would like to call me.  My direct line is 480-282-5361.  

Thanks.

Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jodie,<br />
1. The vast majority of hydrualic calculations for fire sprinkler systems are performed on a computer. There may be a small demand for a calculator to be used in doing field surveys, waterflow analysis, and such but I emphasize that it would most likely be very small.  However, one possible exception would be the future single family residential sprinkler market.  The hydraulic calculations are much simpler than those requried for multi-unit residential or commerical applications.  Plumbing contractors would be the target but we are probably several years away from a vialble market.<br />
2. I do not have a definite workforce size but it is estimated that there are approximately 7500 active fire protectoin contractors in the United States. the majorty are small cottage businesses.  I would estimate total workforce of 60,000 to 70,000 with about 80% being field (installers/fitters).<br />
3. there is very little need to use hydraulic calculations beyond basic principles.</p>
<p>Not sure if this is much help.  I would be happy to discuss further if you would like to call me.  My direct line is 480-282-5361.  </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Welcome from Russ Leavitt by Jodie R</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/welcome-from-russ-leavitt/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Jodie R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=5#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Hi Russ, 

I recently saw your name associated with a series of hydraulic calculation courses offered by the AFSA and I wanted to see if I can get your opinion on a project I’m researching for my company. 
 
I work with Calculated Industries.  Our corporate goal is to create handheld calculators for professionals with formulas and calculations to help them become more accurate and efficient while on the job.  We try to cater our electronic calculators toward specialized industries.
  
We are currently researching the idea of creating a calculator that would offer an easy way to compute hydraulic calculations.  I am hoping to get some insight on the following: 

1.  Do you feel that this would be a viable calculator?  In other words, do you think there is a need for a handheld calculator within the Fire Sprinkler industry?

2.  Do you know the estimated size of the workforce within the Fire Sprinkler industry?

3.  Is there a need for those out in the field (the installers) to use or know any hydraulic calculations?

I would appreciate any opinion or information you can provide.

If you have any questions regarding the types of calculators we create you can visit our website at www.calculated.com.

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Russ, </p>
<p>I recently saw your name associated with a series of hydraulic calculation courses offered by the AFSA and I wanted to see if I can get your opinion on a project I’m researching for my company. </p>
<p>I work with Calculated Industries.  Our corporate goal is to create handheld calculators for professionals with formulas and calculations to help them become more accurate and efficient while on the job.  We try to cater our electronic calculators toward specialized industries.</p>
<p>We are currently researching the idea of creating a calculator that would offer an easy way to compute hydraulic calculations.  I am hoping to get some insight on the following: </p>
<p>1.  Do you feel that this would be a viable calculator?  In other words, do you think there is a need for a handheld calculator within the Fire Sprinkler industry?</p>
<p>2.  Do you know the estimated size of the workforce within the Fire Sprinkler industry?</p>
<p>3.  Is there a need for those out in the field (the installers) to use or know any hydraulic calculations?</p>
<p>I would appreciate any opinion or information you can provide.</p>
<p>If you have any questions regarding the types of calculators we create you can visit our website at <a href="http://www.calculated.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.calculated.com</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Be careful what you ask for. . . by Russ Leavitt</title>
		<link>http://www.russleavitt.com/be-careful-what-you-ask-for/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Leavitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russleavitt.com/blog/?p=30#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Fernando,
How the heck are you doing?  Good to hear from you. Give me a shout so we can get together the next time you are in town. How is the family?
Russ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fernando,<br />
How the heck are you doing?  Good to hear from you. Give me a shout so we can get together the next time you are in town. How is the family?<br />
Russ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
